US envoy Brigety leaves South Africa with hope – and a warning

Reuben Brigety, slammed for claiming South Africa loaded weapons onto a Russian ship, leaves with a message: Washington has goodwill towards Pretoria. But a strong relationship requires effort from both sides, writes Vrye Weekblad’s Max du Preez.
December 20, 2024

Say “Ambassador Brigety”, and most South Africans think of the Russian ship Lady R debacle of December 2022 – mostly negatively.

That’s a real pity because Reuben Brigety, 51, is a super bright, engaging diplomat, an “old Africa hand” and Afro-optimist who served as assistant secretary of state for Africa and has a distinguished academic CV. Remember his name.

I always saw him dressed very smartly, with a signature bow tie, so I dug up an old black linen jacket to look vaguely respectable for our meeting at the Cape Grace Hotel on the Cape Town Waterfront. And there he was in a golf shirt, chinos and loafers.

I’ve interviewed quite a few ambassadors and foreign ministers during my time, but few could combine the species’ painful diplomatic correctness with some proper human reactions like Brigety. He even almost succeeded in avoiding the typical academic’s precious phraseology.

He and his family had “lots of fun” during his tenure in South Africa, he says. “South Africans are sports-loving people, and so are we,” he says, adding that he did a lot of scuba diving around our shores.

He’s rather in awe of the people of South Africa. “This beautiful phrase of ‘we will find each other’ is the one thing that I will take from South Africa. We don’t say that in the US.

“South Africa is very forthright about telling the history of apartheid, which is something that has taken my country a time to get to,” he says.

“There is something beautiful about South Africans saying we are not forgetting the trauma, but we’re making a firm decision to move forward together, as articulated by the Freedom Charter and founding father Madiba’s vision of a rainbow nation. Those are very powerful ideals that have real currency.”

‘Saffers will find each other’

My predictable question to a non-South African: “Is there something like a South African spirit; do we as a people have a distinct character?”

“I absolutely believe that. Example: in the aftermath of the May election when President Cyril Ramaphosa, as president of the ANC, saw his party’s support collapse to 40% – if that had happened in any other parliamentary democracy, the leader of the party would be out the next day.”

This was on display when Ramaphosa conceded a loss for the ANC and, in a grand Nelson Mandela-like gesture, opened the door to a government of national unity (GNU), evoking the early days of democracy of 1994. That nine other parties “accepted the offer, and a functional governing system was established in under two weeks, is extraordinary. I genuinely cannot think of another place where something like this has happened – or where it even could happen,” he says.

“So yes, I do think from an analytical perspective there is something to be said for, notwithstanding all the worries in the system, when it comes down to it, Saffers, if I may use the term, will find each other. And I think that is something really special.”

Brigety sounds like a bit of a Ramaphosa fan. He says on the formation of the GNU: “I think you have to give President Ramaphosa enormous personal credit for that decision. Even if one says, ‘Of course, he had to concede,’ it was not a foregone conclusion that the ANC would form a GNU. It could have gone with EFF, even MK, or a minority government, the way most other countries would have gone. Your GNU is unheard of.”

Brigety says the only disappointing and concerning thing about South Africa is how much the level of inequality continues to exist 30 years after we became a democracy. “The people made clear in the election their frustrations, challenges of the economy, service delivery, and they expect a change, which is going around the world.”

What should South Africa do about it? Is it our fate?

“No, I don’t think it is your fate. Madiba said it isn’t possible until it’s done. My own country has struggled very deeply with these kind of questions. After the civil war, for a century, there was the so-called negro question: what are we to do with this mass of humanity that had been so fundamentally dispossessed. Is it even possible?

“The idea that you would see a Barack Obama or a Condoleezza Rice or any of these real champions of the American way of life from all political walks of life that happened to be African American had ascended to great heights was for sure unthinkable 150 years ago and most unimaginable when my parents were kids.

“But I think in the context of South Africa, it is going to require a different approach in governance. That’s the message that voters up and down the spectrum were sending to parliament.

“In a democracy, the price of being a free people is that nobody is going to come to save us. We have to do this ourselves. And there is no problem South Africa is faced with that is not being faced by other countries, on the African continent or elsewhere. In some cases, like with load-shedding, South Africa had overcome challenges by itself.

“The demand is clear: a growing economy, jobs, a more equal society. My hope is that the political leadership will heed that.”

‘You can’t clap with one hand’

The ambassador appears proud of his achievements in his role over the past two years and five months. He is leaving the position with Donald Trump taking over the presidency from Joe Biden, a standard procedure with the change of administrations.

Brigety tried to bridge relations, where, in the past, the US and South Africa were talking past each other, and Washington didn’t do enough to communicate effectively.

“In many ways, I’m grateful that in my tenure, both sides of that relationship had come to reappreciate the strategic importance of the other, which is why we saw the growth in engagement on both sides. About one-third of the senate has been to South Africa since I’ve been here. President Ramaphosa has been to the White House, and many, many South African leaders visited Washington.”

But later on in the conversation, Brigety’s frustrations with the ANC become a little more apparent.

“The world has changed a great deal in the past 30 years. In the spirit of ‘we find each other’, we have continued to try and engage the ANC leadership productively. That has been challenging in the past 10, 15 years, especially during my tenure.

“You can’t clap with one hand. It takes two sides. My government has demonstrated its willingness to back South Africa fully. It is in the interests of the US that South Africa succeeds as a democracy that can deliver for its people.

“But the cardinal rule of diplomacy is reciprocity. And so my hope, particularly as we go into a new political dispensation in the US, is that there will be greater recognition among many at the political establishment in South Africa of the value of this partnership.”

Question: why is it so hard for Americans to understand the preference among many or most South Africans to be non-aligned internationally, to not want to simply sing in the West’s choir?

“We have no issue with South Africa being non-aligned. Whatever foreign policy South Africa chooses for itself, it’s a sovereign country. The US is also a sovereign country. The whole point of foreign policy is to be able to make your decisions about how you are going to engage the world while anticipating what other countries are going to do in response to your decisions. Under the best of circumstances, one makes those decisions in a way that elevates your interest together.

“We have no problem with South Africa being non-aligned, but we need you to be successful in your non-alignment. That is an ongoing conversation.”

What of Lady R?

Question: what does the ambassador make of the almost instinctive antipathy so many South Africans have towards the US and the West, while having an affinity for countries like Russia, China and Cuba?

“I suppose that I can intellectually follow the train of thought, but I disagree with it, and I think it is belied by the actual fact pattern. I have often said that the US was on the wrong side of history regarding the fight against apartheid for far too long – until a senator named Joseph Biden came to South Africa in 1985 and went back to Washington convinced of the moral evil of apartheid and dedicated himself to fight against it.”

Brigety says one of the reasons the US was so slow to recognise the righteousness of the struggle against apartheid was that it was so slow to recognise racial injustice at home.

“My informed view is that average South Africans have a favourable view of average Americans,” he says.

“Rather than the antipathy towards the US, I actually think we have an awful lot more in common if we take a clearer view of our respective histories together.”

He says the US has, since the transition to democracy, been “four-square” behind democratic South Africa. He says the US is the only trading partner to offer South Africa trade access through the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), and South Africa is the only member of the G20 that gets this kind of special deal. The US has committed more than $20bn to fight the HIV/Aids epidemic in South Africa.

I kept my undiplomatic question for last. Was his statement on what the Russian ship Lady R was really doing in Simon’s Town a mistake?

“I have no comment on that.”

I had to ask, even knowing what the answer would be.

As we said goodbye, I asked what he’s going to do next. Politics?

“I’m going to throw the bowtie away and try pole dancing,” he jokes.

As I said, remember his name: Reuben E Brigety II from Jacksonville, Florida.

Sign up to Currency’s weekly newsletters to receive your own bulletin of weekday news and weekend treats. Register here.

Max du Preez

Editor in chief of Vrye Weekblad and founding editor of the original Vrye Weekblad.

3 free reads

Our gift to you: 3 free reads a month. Subscribe for full access.

sign up for our newsletter

Latest from Opinion

Trump and the shifting paradigm

Dissecting the Trump administration is complicated. But it’s clear the US no longer has the power, or money, to maintain its dominance
Go toTop

Don't Miss